197 research outputs found
Semiparametric Bayesian models for human brain mapping
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has led to enormous progress in human brain mapping. Adequate analysis of the massive spatiotemporal data sets generated by this imaging technique, combining parametric and non-parametric components, imposes challenging problems in statistical modelling. Complex hierarchical Bayesian models in combination with computer-intensive Markov chain Monte Carlo inference are promising tools.The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, it provides a review of general semiparametric Bayesian models for the analysis of fMRI data. Most approaches focus on important but separate temporal or spatial aspects of the overall problem, or they proceed by stepwise procedures. Therefore, as a second aim, we suggest a complete spatiotemporal model for analysing fMRI data within a unified semiparametric Bayesian framework. An application to data from a visual stimulation experiment illustrates our approach and demonstrates its computational feasibility
Experiences of taking neuroleptic medication and impacts on symptoms, sense of self and agency: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative data
PURPOSE: Neuroleptic (antipsychotic) drugs reduce psychotic symptoms, but how they achieve these effects and how the drugs' effects are experienced by people who take them are less well understood. The present study describes a synthesis of qualitative data about mental and behavioural alterations associated with taking neuroleptics and how these interact with symptoms of psychosis and people's sense of self and agency. METHODS: Nine databases were searched to identify qualitative literature concerning experiences of taking neuroleptic medication. A thematic synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: Neuroleptics were commonly experienced as producing a distinctive state of lethargy, cognitive slowing, emotional blunting and reduced motivation, which impaired functioning but also had beneficial effects on symptoms of psychosis and some other symptoms (e.g. insomnia). For some people, symptom reduction helped restore a sense of normality and autonomy, but others experienced a loss of important aspects of their personality. Across studies, many people adopted a passive stance towards long-term medication, expressing a sense of resignation, endurance or loss of autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroleptic drugs modify cognition, emotions and motivation. These effects may be associated with reducing the intensity and impact of symptoms, but also affect people's sense of self and agency. Understanding how the effects of neuroleptics are experienced by those who take them is important in developing a more collaborative approach to drug treatment in psychosis and schizophrenia
Recommended from our members
A systematic review of social functioning outcome measures in schizophrenia with a focus on suitability for intervention research
Social functioning is an important part of recovery and a key treatment target in clinical research in schizophrenia. Evaluating and comparing interventions is challenged by the choice of many measures which focus on different aspects of functioning, with little to guide selection. This results in difficulties comparing outcomes of treatment where studies have used different measures. To improve the measurement of social functioning in intervention research, we aimed to provide practical information on suitability of measures. We conducted a systematic review of measures developed or psychometrically evaluated since 2007, and assessed and discussed the structure, content, quality, and the use of the measures in intervention research. Thirty-two measures of social functioning and 22 validation papers were identified. Measures included structured questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and assessment of performance on specific tasks. The content of measures was organised into eight categories, which are in order of frequency with which they were covered by measures: activities of daily living, productive activity, relationships, leisure activities, cognition, anti-social behaviour, psychosis symptoms and self-esteem and empowerment. In terms of quality, most measures were rated as moderate, with the Personal and Social Performance Scale gaining the highest rating. However, there was little data on responsiveness of measures, or how they compare to objective or ‘real-world’ indicators of functioning. The Social Functioning Scale and Personal and Social Performance Scale have been most frequently used in intervention studies to date. Future research should aim to provide further data on psychometric properties relevant to intervention research
The experience of family carers attending a joint reminiscence group with people with dementia: A thematic analysis
Reminiscence therapy has the potential to improve quality of life for people with dementia. In recent years reminiscence groups have extended to include family members, but carers' experience of attending joint sessions is undocumented. This qualitative study explored the experience of 18 family carers attending 'Remembering Yesterday Caring Today' groups. Semi-structured interviews were transcribed and subjected to thematic analysis. Five themes were identified: experiencing carer support; shared experience; expectations (met and unmet), carer perspectives of the person with dementia's experience; and learning and comparing. Family carers' experiences varied, with some experiencing the intervention as entirely positive whereas others had more mixed feelings. Negative aspects included the lack of respite from their relative, the lack of emphasis on their own needs, and experiencing additional stress and guilt through not being able to implement newly acquired skills. These findings may explain the failure of a recent trial of joint reminiscence groups to replicate previous findings of positive benefit. More targeted research within subgroups of carers is required to justify the continued use of joint reminiscence groups in dementia care
The role of trust and hope in antipsychotic medication reviews between GPs and service users a realist review
Abstract Background Increasing number of service users diagnosed with schizophrenia and psychosis are being discharged from specialist secondary care services to primary care, many of whom are prescribed long-term antipsychotics. It is unclear if General Practitioners (GPs) have the confidence and experience to appropriately review and adjust doses of antipsychotic medication without secondary care support. Aim To explore barriers and facilitators of conducting antipsychotic medication reviews in primary care for individuals with no specialist mental health input. Design & setting Realist review in general practice settings. Method A realist review has been conducted to synthesise evidence on antipsychotic medication reviews conducted in primary care with service users diagnosed with schizophrenia or psychosis. Following initial scoping searches and discussions with stakeholders, a systematic search and iterative secondary searches were conducted. Articles were systematically screened and analysed to develop a realist programme theory explaining the contexts (C) and mechanisms (M) which facilitate or prevent antipsychotic medication reviews (O) in primary care settings, and the potential outcomes of medication reviews. Results Meaningful Antipsychotic medication reviews may not occur for individuals with only primary care medical input. Several, often mutually reinforcing, mechanisms have been identified as potential barriers to conducting such reviews, including low expectations of recovery for people with severe mental illness, a perceived lack of capability to understand and participate in medication reviews, linked with a lack of information shared in appointments between GPs and Service Users, perceived risk and uncertainty regarding antipsychotic medication and illness trajectory. Conclusions The review identified reciprocal and reinforcing stereotypes affecting both GPs and service users. Possible mechanisms to counteract these barriers are discussed, including realistic expectations of medication, and the need for increased information sharing and trust between GPs and service users. </jats:sec
Generation of Potent and Stable Human CD4+ T Regulatory Cells by Activation-independent Expression of FOXP3
Therapies based on enhancing the numbers and/or function of T regulatory cells (Tregs) represent one of the most promising approaches to restoring tolerance in many immune-mediated diseases. Several groups have investigated whether human Tregs suitable for cellular therapy can be obtained by in vitro expansion, in vitro conversion of conventional T cells into Tregs, or gene transfer of the FOXP3 transcription factor. To date, however, none of these approaches has resulted in a homogeneous and stable population of cells that is as potently suppressive as ex vivo Tregs. We developed a lentivirus-based strategy to ectopically express high levels of FOXP3 that do not fluctuate with the state of T-cell activation. This method consistently results in the development of suppressive cells that are as potent as Tregs and can be propagated as a homogeneous population. Moreover, using this system, both naive and memory CD4+ T cells can be efficiently converted into Tregs. To date, this is the most efficient and reliable protocol for generating large numbers of suppressive CD4+ Tregs, which can be used for further biological study and developed for antigen-specific cellular therapy applications
Recommended from our members
Recruitment to a trial of antipsychotic reduction: impact of an acceptability study
Objectives
Pre-trial acceptability studies may boost recruitment, especially in trials comparing distinctly different interventions. We evaluated the impact of an acceptability study on recruitment to a randomised trial of antipsychotic reduction versus maintenance treatment and explored demographic and clinical predictors of subsequent enrolment.
Methods
Participants with a diagnosis of a schizophrenia spectrum disorder who were taking antipsychotic medication were interviewed about their views of taking part in a future trial.
Results
In a sample of 210 participants, 151 (71.9%) expressed an interest in taking part in the future trial, 16 (7.6%) said they might be interested, and 43 (20.5%) said they were not. Altruistic reasons were most commonly given for wanting to take part, and concern about randomisation for not wanting to. Ultimately 57 people enrolled in the trial (27.1% of the original sample). Eighty-five people who initially expressed an interest did not enrol due to declining or not being eligible (for clinical reasons). Women and people from a white ethnic background were more likely to enrol in the trial, but no illness or treatment-related characteristics were associated with enrolment.
Conclusion
An acceptability study can be a useful tool for recruitment to challenging trials, but it may over-estimate recruitment
Support at Home: Interventions to Enhance Life in Dementia (SHIELD) – evidence, development and evaluation of complex interventions
Background: Dementia is a national priority and this research addresses the Prime Minister’s commitment
to dementia research as demonstrated by his 2020 challenge and the new UK Dementia Research Institute.
In the UK > 800,000 older people have dementia. It has a major impact on the lives of people with
dementia themselves, on the lives of their family carers and on services, and costs the nation £26B per
year. Pharmacological cures for dementias such as Alzheimer’s disease are not expected before 2025. If no
cure can be found, the ageing demographic will result in 2 million people living with dementia by 2050.
People with dementia lose much more than just their memory and their daily living skills; they can also lose
their independence, their dignity and status, their confidence and morale, and their roles both within the
family and beyond. They can be seen as a burden by society, by their families and even by themselves, and
may feel unable to contribute to society. This programme of research aims to find useful interventions to
improve the quality of life of people with dementia and their carers, and to better understand how people
with dementia can be supported at home and avoid being admitted to hospital.
Objectives: (1) To develop and evaluate the maintenance cognitive stimulation therapy (MCST) for people
with dementia; (2) to develop the Carer Supporter Programme (CSP), and to evaluate the CSP and
Remembering Yesterday, Caring Today (RYCT) for people with dementia both separately and together in
comparison with usual care; and (3) to develop a home treatment package (HTP) for dementia, to field test
the HTP in practice and to conduct an exploratory trial.
Methods: (1) The MCST programme was developed for people with dementia based on evidence and
qualitative work. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) [with a pilot study of MCST plus acetylcholinesterase
inhibitors (AChEIs)] compared MCST with cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) only. The MCST implementation
study conducted a trial of outreach compared with usual care, and assessed implementation in practice.
(2) The CSP was developed based on existing evidence and the engagement of carers of people with dementia. The RCT (with internal pilot) compared the CSP and reminiscence (RYCT), both separately and
in combination, with usual care. (3) A HTP for dementia, including the most promising interventions and
components, was developed by systematically reviewing the literature and qualitative studies including
consensus approaches. The HTP for dementia was evaluated in practice by conducting in-depth field testing.
Results: (1) Continuing MCST improved quality of life and improved cognition for those taking AChEIs.
It was also cost-effective. The CST implementation studies indicated that many staff will run CST groups
following a 1-day training course, but that outreach support helps staff go on to run maintenance groups
and may also improve staff sense of competence in dementia care. The study of CST in practice found no
change in cognition or quality of life at 8-month follow-up. (2) The CSP/RYCT study found no benefits for
family carers but improved quality of life for people with dementia. RYCT appeared beneficial for the
quality of life of people with dementia but at an excessively high cost. (3) Case management for people
with dementia reduces admissions to long-term care and reduces behavioural problems. In terms of
managing crises, staff suggested more costly interventions, carers liked education and support, and people
with dementia wanted family support, home adaptations and technology. The easy-to-use home treatment
manual was feasible in practice to help staff working in crisis teams to prevent hospital admissions for
people with dementia.
Limitations: Given constraints on time and funding, we were unable to compete the exploratory trial of
the HTP package or to conduct an economic evaluation.
Future research: To improve the care of people with dementia experiencing crises, a large-scale clinical
trial of the home treatment manual is needed.
Conclusion: There is an urgent need for effective psychosocial interventions for dementia. MCST improved
quality of life and was cost-effective, with benefits to cognition for those on AChEIs. MCST was feasible in
practice. Both CSP and RYCT improved the quality of life of people with dementia, but the overall costs
may be too high. The HTP was useful in practice but requires evaluation in a full trial. Dementia care
research may improve the lives of millions of people across the world.
Trial registrations: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN26286067 (MCST), ISRCTN28793457 (MCST
implementation) and ISRCTN37956201 (CSP/RYCT).
Funding: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants
for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research;
Vol. 5, No. 5. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information
- …